FURTHER PROOF GOOGLE LIKES QUALITY LINKS OVER QUANTITY?
We have all heard it before from someone else in the SEO industry, or even read about it on Search Engine Land, Search Engine Watch, or heard it discussed. But really, how do we know that Google really does like quality links to your website over quantity? In a recent review of several posts that I’ve made here on the Globe Runner blog, I’ve noticed something very interesting: Google Authorship Photo Snippets appear in search results based on quality of links, not necessarily on the quantity of links.
I took a look at 6 blog posts I’ve made here on the Globe Runner blog. Yes, I know this isn’t a very large or statistically relevant sampling, but it’s what I’ve got. And there happens to be some interesting findings if you look at all of these posts and the data that I gathered.
When I first starting gathering all of the data, I wanted to see why certain blog posts of mine are showing the Google Authorship photo snippet, which Mark Traphagen and I have talked about and reviewed on an earlier post. That post is an interesting read, and Mark’s comments are worth reading, as well.
But that’s not what I ended up finding in my quick research regarding these posts. Let’s take a look at all of the information I gathered. Again, it’s not a lot of info, but preliminarily there is one post that stands out: the one that has the most links. But, interestingly enough, there is no Google Authorship photo snippet in the search results.
Google Authorship Photo Snippet Appears
Is Google Authorship Photo Snippet Query Dependent, Not Content Quality or Author Dependent?
https://globerunner.com/google-authorship-photo-snippet-query-dependent-content-quality-author-dependent
Links to G+ custom URL
49 results in Google for Title in quotes
Majestic: 24 links from 12 domains
Open Site Explorer: 0 backlinks
Ahrefs: 7 backlinks, 6 domains
Listed in SEL searchcap
7 Tweets
15 G +1s
1 Page Authority
Google Authorship Photo Snippet Appears
Google Gives Webmasters Better Search Query Data in Webmaster Tools
https://globerunner.com/google-gives-webmasters-better-search-query-data-webmaster-tools
Links to G+ custom URL
34 results in Google for Title in quotes
Majestic: 0 backlinks
Open Site Explorer: 0 backlinks
Ahrefs: 0 backlinks
1 tweet
61 G +1s
1 page Authority
No Google Authorship Photo Snippet
How To: Add Do Follow Links on LinkedIn
https://globerunner.com/add-follow-links-linkedin
Post linked to old G+ Url, not the new one with custom URL.
229 results in Google for Title in quotes
Majestic: 22 backlinks, 10 domains
Open Site Explorer: 9 links, 4 domains
Ahrefs: 17 Links, 7 domains
Mostly social bookmark links, no quality links
28 Tweets
36 G +1s
38 Page Authority
No Google Authorship Photo Snippet
Google Authorship Photo Snippet in Search Results Not Author Dependent
https://globerunner.com/google-authorship-photo-snippet-search-results
Post didn’t have authorship verified. Now fixed. We’ll see if it eventually shows photo snippet.
32 results in Google for Title in quotes
Majestic: 24 backlinks, 7 domains
Open Site Explorer: 0 links, 0 domains
Ahrefs: 4 backlinks, 1 domain
Mostly social bookmarks, no quality links
3 Tweets
12 G +1s
1 Page Authority
Google Authorship Photo Snippet Appears
10 SEO Posts that Shaped 2013
https://globerunner.com/10-seo-posts-shaped-2013
Post links to old G+ profile, NOT the new custom URL for G+ profile
235 results in Google for Title in quotes
Majestic: 19 links, 8 domains
Open Site Explorer: 3 links, 1 domain
Ahrefs: 20 backlinks, 8 domains
Mostly social bookmarks, no quality links
30 Tweets
15 G +1s
27 Page Authority
Google Authorship Photo Snippet Appears
New Contributor To A Blog? Here’s What You Need to Do
https://globerunner.com/new-contributor-blog-heres-need
34 results in Google for Title in Quotes
Majestic: 3 links, 2 domains
Open Site Explorer: 1 link, 1 domain
Ahrefs: 2 links, 2 domains
1 link from an authority site.
44 Tweets
8 G +1s
24 page Authority
So, with all of these posts, I checked the following information:
– whether or not the post has my Google Authorship photo snippet appear
– the title of the post
– the URL of the post
– the number of results in Google for a search with that post title in quotes
– Number of Majestic SEO links to the post
– Number of Open Site Explorer links to the post
– Number of Ahrefs.com links to the post
– whether or not there are any “good” or authority links to the post
– how many Tweets to the post
– how many Google +1s on the post
– the page authority of the post
There was one post in particular, the one about dofollow links to LinkedIn, that has the most links. Yet it still has a low Page Authority after several weeks of being posted. There are really not a lot of quality links to the post. I couldn’t find any links from authority sites to the post. Mainly lower quality social bookmarks to the post (feel free to check the links yourself).
But, what’s interesting to note here is the fact that the Google Authorship Photo Snippet shows up for certain posts and NOT the post that has the most links (by far). In fact, there is a post where the photo snippet appears with only 3 links! One of those links is from an “authority” site or domain Technorati. And, of course, the post that got linked from Search Engine Land also has its Google Authorship Photo Snippet appear in the search results.
So, could this be preliminarily the Google “Author Rank” at work that we’ve all heard about? Perhaps. But from what I can tell, Google shows the photo snippet from Google Authorship with posts when that post has links from sites that have authority and that are trusted. It’s a good thing to have your photo appear in search results: so why not tie that with posts that have good links.
What do you think? Is this proof that you need quality links over a large quantity of links? I personally think so. In fact, whether or not your photo appears in search results can be dependent on ONE link.
Bill Hartzer is Globe Runner’s Senior SEO Strategist. Follow him on Google Plus.
GOOGLE QUIETLY UPDATES LINK QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR WIDGETS
Google has quietly updated their link quality guidelines for widgets. More specifically, in Google’s Acceptable Webmaster Guidelines (in Google Webmaster Tools), they have changed the wording in the link schemes section.
I took a look at the archive.org update for that page on January 9th, and it appears that the change was not there. But today, January 10, 2014, the section on widgets has been update to read:
Keyword-rich, hidden or low-quality links embedded in widgets that are distributed across various sites, for example:
Visitors to this page: 1,472
car insurance
Previously, the text on the page said this:
Links embedded in widgets that are distributed across various sites, for example:
Visitors to this page: 1,472
car insurance
This is actually a very interesting update on Google’s front. They actually now are more lenient when it comes to links within widgets. They previously said that all links embedded in widgets would hurt search engine rankings. But now, they realize that there are some links in widgets that can be helpful. Or at least that’s the impression that they’re giving me.
I only hope that they continue to re-evaluate their link policies in the future like this and realize that there are cases where links are actually helpful to surfers.
So, what does this change mean? Google has a problem with widgets being used as a link tactic, especially when the intent of the link embedded in the widget is not a quality link. In other words, I personally interpret this new change as meaning that it’s now “okay” to embed links in widgets. However, if you use a keyword-rich anchor text link, a hidden link, or a low quality link (perhaps a link that’s off-topic to the subject of the widget), then you could get penalized for those links in the widgets. I would go as far as saying that you probably should not sell links in your widgets.
But, I also interpret this to meaning that if you created the widget and distribute it, then it’s okay for you to include a link back to the site if you are the owner of the widget and you want people to know how to get the widget, for example. If you embed a link in a widget, I recommend using a branded link or your company name as the anchor text to make sure there is no confusion (and you don’t get penalized).
One example of a ‘widget’ that would fall into this category would be infographics. As long as you include a branded anchor text link (your company name or website name) in the link code, when people embed the infographic in their site those links would be okay. If it were to be a keyword-rich link then Google would have an issue with those links.
h/t to Barry Schwartz and Kenichi Suzuki for noticing this change.
Bill Hartzer is Globe Runner’s Senior SEO Strategist. You can follow him on Google Plus.
GOOGLE AUTHORSHIP PHOTO SNIPPET IN SEARCH RESULTS NOT AUTHOR DEPENDENT
I recently wrote about the Google Authorship photo snippet not being author-dependent, but rather it’s search query dependent. In that post, I showed two examples of the same exact URL in the search results: one search query showed the Google Authorship photo snippet, and another search query showed the same URL (same blog post) without the photo snippet.
I can now, with confidence, say that the Google Authorship photo snippet is most likely not related to the actual author who wrote the content. Just because a certain author wrote an article on your site (and properly verified Google Authorship), doesn’t mean that their photo will appear in the search results when someone searches in Google and that article appears in the search results.
Have a good, quality author that’s Google Authorship verified on your site does NOT mean that their photo will appear in the search results for all (or even some) queries.
Let’s look at a specific example. I have verified my authorship with Google on this site and my authorship is not showing in the search results:
For the search query “Google Authorship Photo Snippet“, here is the search results as I see it:
I have verified Google Authorship on this site, and the Rich Snippets Testing Tool shows that Google Authorship is working:
But, for this particular search query, Google is choosing not to show the Google Authorship Photo Snippet in the search results. Not only that, they’re choosing not to show that Authorship has been verified, which is one of the “classes” of Authorship:
1. The Google search result shows the verified author’s photo and name in the search result, like the one below:
2. The Google search result shows the verified author’s name, but no photo, like the one below:
3. The Google search result does not show the verified author’s name or photo in the search results.
There are reports that Google is working on author authority but that “has not officially been rolled out yet.”
So, what is definitely a given is that this is definitely going to change in the future. Expect changes to the Google Authorship Photo Snippets in the search results, as it’s a fluid situation that’s going to change as Google eventually rolls out “author authority”.
Bill Hartzer is Globe Runner’s Senior SEO Strategist. Follow him on Google Plus.
GOOGLE GIVES WEBMASTERS BETTER SEARCH QUERY DATA IN WEBMASTER TOOLS
Maybe this is could be called a late Christmas present from Google, but the search engine is now giving website owners more detailed search query data. If you have verified your website in Google Webmaster Tools, then you’ll be able to log in, view the search query report, and see more accurate data.
Above is an example of the Search Query report in Google Webmaster Tools. To see this report, do the following:
1. Log into Webmaster Tools.
2. Click on the Search Traffic link on the left.
3. Click on the Search Queries link on the left side.
On the graphic, you’ll see a “Update” line. If you mouseover this, you will see the following:
“An improvement to our top search queries data was applied retroactively on 12/31/2013.”
According to the Google announcement blog post on the Google Webmaster Central blog, “The search queries feature gives insights into the searches that have at least one page from your website shown in the search results. It collects these “impressions” together with the times when users visited your site – the “clicks” – and displays these for the last 90 days.”
Apparently we were not seeing the actual number of impressions and clicks before (although I thought we were seeing that data). But apparently now, the actual data is presented here in the Google Search Queries report.
Bill Hartzer is Globe Runner’s Senior SEO Strategist. Follow him on Google Plus.
IS GOOGLE AUTHORSHIP PHOTO SNIPPET QUERY DEPENDENT, NOT CONTENT QUALITY OR AUTHOR DEPENDENT?
Google has recently confirmed, and Search Engine Land has reported back in December that Google “has applied a 15% reduction in the amount of rich snippets displayed in the search results.” Some have even called that an Authorshippocalypse is going on. Eeeek! Oh, the horror! There are changes going on.
So, many website owners and bloggers who have verified their Google Authorship are not always having their photo appear in the search results. Blog posts that show the author’s photo in the search results get more clicks. And even maybe less clicks for authors who have verified authorship and only have their name linked (but no photo) show up in the search results.
There are even times when someone has verified their Google Authorship but they’re not seeing a snippet at all show up in the search results (no photo and no name). If this is the case, the author can verify that Google Authorship is working by going to the Rich Snippets Testing Tool. Entering a URL will show whether Google Authorship is working or not.
There appears to be three different “classes” of Google Authorship now:
1. The Google search result shows the verified author’s photo and name in the search result, like the one below:
2. The Google search result shows the verified author’s name, but no photo, like the one below:
3. The Google search result does not show the verified author’s name or photo in the search results.
There is some speculation out there as to why exactly the Google shows the photo of the author in the search results and in some cases shows the verified author’s name only. In other cases, there are no author details shown. So what can you do to “force” Google to show your photo in the search results if you’ve verified Google Authorship? Well, from what I can tell, it’s NOT the quality of your posts or content, and whether your photo appears is not dependent on the quality of the author.
From what I can tell, it’s query dependent, and not author or content dependent. Let’s look at some proof of search queries that show the same exact URL, the same exact verified author, but different search results.
Let’s look at an example of one particular search query (of one of my prior blog posts) that shows the author snippet but NO photo (look at the LAST search result shown below, it has no photo):
In the case above, you can see the search query, which, in this case, was “site:billhartzer.com”. So, it looks like this blog post, about anchor text and links, is NOT “good enough” to force Google to show the author’s (my) photo in the search result.
But wait.
Let’s do a search query for something else. Let’s use another search query to force this same exact blog post to show up in the search results. Let’s use something that someone would actually search for:
This just goes to show (or prove) that whether or not the Google Authorship photo appears in the search results DEPENDS ON THE SEARCH QUERY and does NOT depend on the quality of the article or the quality of the articles that the author writes (and posts).
Granted, in order to have your Google Authorship show up in the search result and have your photo show up, you have to verify authorship (that part is a given) and it has to be working properly. However, the quality of the content doesn’t matter. Google will, in fact, decide to show your photo in the search results based on the actual search query.
Added – January 8, 2014
Let’s look at another example of when the search query causes a photo to show in the search results and when it doesn’t show the photo:
In the case above, I’m not searching my site like I did previously. I searched for something that didn’t involve a search of my blog site. In the case below, however, let’s look at another query that is perhaps longer but still brings up the same “about” page on my blog:
So, these are two different search queries that pull up the same exact URL in the search results, the “about” page on my personal blog. It appears to me that whether or not the photo appears in the search result depends on the actual query. As Mark suggests below in the comments, since I’m using the same site to show the difference between a search query that has the photo and a search query that does not have the photo, this is not the Google Authorship reduction.
Bill Hartzer is Globe Runner’s Senior SEO Strategist. Follow him on Google Plus.
10 SEO POSTS THAT SHAPED 2013
A lot happened in the search engine optimization industry during 2013. There were changes that happened that will forever change the way SEOs do their jobs–and how we market websites in the future. Many of these changes were predicted by many, and then there were changes that we didn’t expect. Here is my list of the 10 SEO-related blog posts that shaped the SEO industry during 2013. I chose these blog posts and articles not because the articles themselves did the shaping: but the topic they covered shaped the industry. However, in the case of Moz, I think that posts speaks for itself.
FTC Sets Sights on Native Advertising, But Outcome Unclear – It’s not just Google that has issues with Advertorials. I have seen a lot of sites get manual penalties from Google in 2013 because of Advertorials and not being compliant with the FTC guidelines for disclosure. This was a very big issue during 2013 and I fully expect it to be even a bigger issue during 2014.
SEO’s Dilemma – Link Building vs. Content Marketing – Whiteboard Friday – This Whiteboard Friday details a really big issue that online marketers, SEOs, and web marketers had to deal with in 2013. Link building, link earning, or Content Marketing? I saw a lot of SEOs jump from link building to content marketing during 2013. Maybe those still offering article submissions will finally jump to content marketing during 2014. What do you think?
Goodbye SEOmoz, Hello Moz. Yes, way back in 2011 I predicted it and during 2013 they finally rebranded. This was not only a big deal for Moz, but a big deal for the industry. Could a company such as SEOmoz pull off such a major brand change? Absolutely. And they did it in style during 2013.
Penguin 2.0 rolled out today – May 22nd, 2013 was a big day for many sites. Not because of the traffic they received that day–but that was about the last day that they’ve seen lots of traffic to their site. Google Penguin hit quite a lot of sites during 2013 and many sites still have yet to recover. Definitely a topic that everyone in the SEO industry will remember for 2013. Lucky for some SEOs who help sites recover from Google Penguin, such as Globe Runner. But 2013 was very unlucky for those sites who suffered as a result of Google Penguin.
Google Humminbgird FAQ by Search Engine Land – Google Hummingbird was announced in September 2013. Sites weren’t really affected too much that they knew about–but this new algorithm will shape the future of Google’s organic search. Definitely worth mentioning in 2013.
Why Google’s New Hummingbird Algorithm is Good News for Serious Content Creators – Hummingbird is good news for those of us who create content. Here’s why. Eric Enge, posting on Copyblogger.com, nails it this time.
Want to Rank in Google? Build Author Rank Now – 2013 is also the year of Author Rank. If you have not already started paying attention to Google Author Rank, you need to in 2014. This is a great post by Eric Enge that does a great job of explaining why verified authors are going to be important.
Study Shows No Clear Evidence That Google+ Drives Ranking – 2013 is not only the year of Google Plus, Authorship, and Author Rank, it’s also the “Year of Enge”. That’s Eric Enge, mind you. During 2013, Mr. Enge’s Stone Temple Consulting put together a study showing that Google Plus doesn’t drive search engine rankings in Google organic search. Well, even though apparently Google Plus isn’t a driver of rankings, 2013 is definitely the year of Google Plus and the year that we’re starting to see more SEOs embrace it as a social network. I personally saw more SEOs start posting regularly during 2013 on Google Plus than they did previously.
Optimized Links in Press Releases & Guest Posts Can Harm Your SEO, Says Google – Another big story was the fact that Optimized Anchor Text in press releases was targeted by Google. One major SEO tactic for a lot of SEO firms in the past had been writing press releases for PRWeb and other “press release sites”, and adding optimized anchor text. Google shut down that pretty quickly during 2013, and the press release services such as PRWeb.com started adding the nofollow attribute to all links in press releases.
Google Warns Against Large-Scale Guest Posting, Advertorials & “Optimized Anchor Text” In Press Releases – Not only did Google shake up the Press Release industry for SEOs, Google also took aim at guest posts and advertorials, as I previously mentioned. 2013 is the year that Google changed some of the link strategies of some SEO firms, and many of their clients got penalized as a result.
So, not only was 2013 a year of Google updates, but those updates changed forever how the SEO industry builds links to client sites. I have to admit, though, that it was a long time coming. Those SEO firms who were relying on press releases, advertorials, and guest posts for rankings were relying on unnatural link building. And not the content marketing and link earning that all of us should be doing.
Bill Hartzer is Globe Runner’s Senior SEO Strategist. Follow him on Google Plus.
HOW TO: ADD DO FOLLOW LINKS ON LINKEDIN
I’m really a big fan of LinkedIn now. I’ve been on LinkedIn for about 10 years now, even when it was not “cool” to have a listing on LinkedIn. Sure, I have a lot of connections, and I admit that there certainly were “tricks” or “tips” to building your LinkedIn network. But that’s really not why I’m so much of a fan of LinkedIn. In fact, it’s because LinkedIn has become a social network of sorts, where you can add updates to your home page when you log in. It’s those updates that are actually bring traffic to sites. If I share an article from my blog, for example, if the post is good, I can see the traffic that comes from LinkedIn. Especially if it’s a good post. So, posting on LinkedIn can bring you traffic. But what’s one of the other benefits? Adding a link. And, if you add the link in a certain way, you can actually make that link a “do follow” link. Here is how to add a “do follow” link to LinkedIn.
Once you log into LinkedIn, your home page will like something like this:
Notice the form filed where it says, “Share an update”. This is just like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Plus. You can actually share an update, post something, or, if you prefer, say something and add a link to a news article, your website, or, like I do, a post on your blog. Once I post a blog post, I usually go over to Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus, and, now, LinkedIn to add a link to the blog post I just wrote. In fact, I’m going to do just that when I’m done writing this post. But I digress.
In this case, on LinkedIn, it’s important to make sure that you have some sort of image in the post or article that you’re going to share. People like to see a small thumbnail of the post or something interesting–it helps with the important “click thru rate” on your update.
When you share your update, say something unique about the blog post or the article that you’re linking to.
In order to make the post’s link be a “do follow” link, simply add the URL of the link right after whatever you say about the post. Let’s look at an example of this.
In a recent post, I shared a blog post that I posted on the Globe Runner blog. Here’s what I posted:
Is content marketing on your wish list this year? Well, here is how to take advantage of content marketing for your site and how to promote that content. https://globerunner.com/content-marketing-wish-list/
Notice that what I actually posted includes a full URL at the end of it. LinkedIn automatically changed that link to http://lnkd.in/bPJPNGj which is really not a big deal. That short URL actually 301 redirects to the URL that you added in the share/update. But, I’m not too concerned about the fact that it’s a 301 redirect. What’s important here is that if you look at what I posted you’ll see that the “short URL” is actually “do follow” link.
I have a Firefox add-on installed on my browser that puts a red outline around all links that have the “nofollow” link attribute attached to them. In this case, you’ll notice that the link in the share/update, the short URL, has no red outline. But, the link below that DOES have the red outline, meaning that it’s a nofollow link.
Just to clarify, there really is no such thing as a “dofollow” or “do follow” link. Those are just links that do not have the “nofollow” link attribute added to them. It seems that many SEOs have adopted the terminology of “do follow” or “dofollow” to make it clear that it’s a “good” link.
So, if you you want a “do follow” link on LinkedIn, all you have to do is post the URL at the end of what you say about the URL.
Bill Hartzer is Globe Runner’s Senior SEO Strategist. Follow him on Google Plus.
10 CLEVER LAST MINUTE HALLOWEEN COSTUMES
For my first ever blog post I’m going to keep it simple and by simple I mean a lot of pictures with few words. In honor of Halloween I’ve compiled a list, picture list that is, of the top 10 easiest/most clever last minute costumes. Enjoy!
10. A little face paint + a deep v-neck and you’re French Kiss…
9. For all you powerful women out there, grab a blue button down and a red headband. You can do it!
8. Put on a little yellow face paint, a fake mustache, and some glasses and Hey-Diddly-Ho, you’re Ned Flanders.
7. Or trade the yellow paint for a cardboard sign Goshhhh…
6. If you have access to ceiling tiles, find some electrical tape and learn how to spell debt.
5. This next costume is great if you’re looking to steal beer all night without getting in trouble. After all you’re just staying in character!
4. For all you gingers out there looking for a last minute costume on a budget, this one’s for you!
3. You know that red flannel t-shirt you like to wear every other day of the year? Why should today be any different?
2. I can always appreciate a great nerd costume and this one is by far the easiest.
1. And the easiest and most clever costume for all you last minute party goers…
Well I feel pretty good about this first ever blog post. I hope you enjoyed it as much as I did!
Picture Sources:
http://sarcasticcharm.com/17-halloween-costumes-that-are-actually-clever
http://sarcasticcharm.com/25-best-homemade-halloween-costumes-ever-totally-awesome
https://www.businessinsider.com/tech-halloween-costumes-2013-10#simple-nerdy-oh-so-funny-2
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/best-halloween-costumes-o_n_4170143
GOOGLE GLASS AT SMC DALLAS
I’ve always been a bit of a gadget girl. I love tech toys. So when Google Glass came out, I read the articles, watched the videos, and “liked” (a bit enviously) the picture a college friend posted on Facebook showing a Google Glass box. I hoped I would somehow get the chance to play with Google Glass. Then last night it happened!
I went to a Social Media Club of Dallas meeting, and there was not one but two guys walking around wearing Google Glass. Within a couple minutes and some awkward please notice me staring moments, one of the guys walked over to the group I was with. I tried really hard to wait an appropriate amount of time and have enough polite conversation before asking with what I hoped was innocent curiosity but probably came out as slightly over-eager, “Aren’t you wearing Google Glass?”
This guy must be used to this or could sense my determination and intense desire to get my hands on his Google Glass because a minute later this was happening:
Glass was surprisingly difficult to use, I’m hoping it was due to all of the noise in the Angelika lobby, but then again, I’m not sure…
It doesn’t seem like my experience was that unique.
That video pretty much sums up my success rate using Glass. I tried to navigate to my house, but since I don’t have an android phone to connect, that was unsuccessful. I couldn’t look up anything due to Glass’ inability to understand my commands. I did, however, inadvertently share a picture to G+.
And the “coolest” thing I tried to do with Glass?
Yes, that’s a selfie of me trying to take a picture of me taking a picture of me. An attempted selfie of a selfie.
Have you tried Google Glass? What did you think? What’s the coolest thing you’ve done with Glass?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks again to the incredibly accommodating @chrisgoulet for the use of his Google Glass and @andyodom7 and @theedcelmer for indulging my need to document every second of my Google Glass experience.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- …
- 44
- Next Page »